Student Essentials For Back to College
Thus, the breadth of what needs to be changed to deploy a new platform technology is significant.. Resistance to challenging accepted practice.
This approach, exemplified by Platform II, leverages the benefits of manufacturing at the component level while achieving manufacturing-like productivity on-site.It allows for fast, accurate, low-carbon frames, and efficient MEP design and installation, addressing previous concerns while enhancing efficiency and sustainability.. 2.
Standardisation at component level with endless configuration:.Platform II standardises at the component level, allowing for complete freedom at the asset level, akin to IKEA's business model.This method uses simple commodities like standard steel sections and in situ concrete with highly optimised interfaces manufactured at scale.
It supports endless configuration possibilities, enabling a wide range of designs and uses from a single kit of parts.This approach mirrors strategies used in the car and consumer tech industries for mass customisation while maintaining standardisation at the base level.. 3.
Diverse and inclusive supply chain with simplified assembly:.
The platform approach allows a diverse range of suppliers, including new entrants, to contribute without significant capital investment.Ultimately, such a process allows a focus of effort on architectural features which enhance the built environment, says Jami.. She is currently working with the Creative Technologies team on two such projects.
The first is a web app to accelerate the design of precision manufactured housing in London for the Greater London Authority (GLA).It allows users to create intelligent models within a 3D context, based on government space standards and DfMA rationale.
Adaptability and feedback on the suitability of certain DfMA construction systems are just some of its features.Cresser-Brown notes that because designs are generated at speed, it allows users to ‘make objective decisions based on far greater exploratory studies than possible using traditional feasibility workflows.’.